| :::::::::::::::: | Physical Computing | ||||
| :::::::::::::::: | Week 05 | ||||
| :::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::: |
Week 06 Week 07 Week 08 Week 09 Week 10 |
||||
| Regroup | |||||
In terms of design, we spoke of the implementation of a screen into the next version. The screen may add an additional layer of information or visual stimulation. If done correctly this can be a beneficial design element, reinforcing our concept and design, if done poorly it may appear to be a second thought add-on, relegating the design into a "blinky" toy with an attached screen. It's worth researching and discussing. We wanted to explore several ideas: adding a screen, making it portable, making it modular, concentrate on interface design, adding several features, building a MIDI, making it portable and wireless. Possibility of Screen Implementation
Interface Design Research Then we explored the interface design, and spoke to Jeff Gray, who did a similar project, called the "Social Instrument." He shared some criticisms of his group's instruments. We received valuable feedback about interface design. He suggested that we reverse the curve of the keys to emulate the curve of an ergonmical keyboard. He also suggested that the octave keys were too close, and may explore changing their form into "slider bars" on the far edges of the instrument. Instead of one button to change chords, he suggested 7 additional buttons for different chords, since musicians often change chords in one song.
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||